Disney+ has updated its subscriber agreement to allow advertising before and after movies and shows across every subscription tier. The change quietly ends completely ad-free streaming on the platform, even for those paying top dollar.

That includes the Premium plan, which costs $18.99 a month and was originally sold on the promise of an uninterrupted viewing experience.

Subscribers now face an on-screen prompt when logging in, requiring them to actively accept the updated terms before they can keep watching.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 days ago

    Can’t wait to hear from the crowd that said it was fine when they introduced an ad tier because they still had a non-ad tier. Despite everyone that has seen how this always goes before telling them it was only a matter of time before legally watching Disney owned content was going to mean paying a substantial monthly fee and having to sit through ads.

    Let this be a lesson everyone that said that. Once they build the mechanism to have the ads, they will not be able to resist turning up the dial for the easy ad money.

  • Thomas_More@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Glad I have kept my 1000+ dvd/bluray movie collection, given the way streaming has become nothing but fricken ads

  • Omega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    The Disney ad-free tier is literally the same as Peacock’s ad-tier for movies. Wtf

    • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      9 days ago

      Some republican politicians are actually trying to push a legislation to require ISPs and VPN providers and whatever to block “foreign pirating sites”. I know there will always be a way for those who know what they’re doing, but they’re squeezing people little by little into having to pay these subscriptions no matter what companies do. I’ll personally just quit watching tv altogether if I had no choice but to pay these fuckers. I have zero subscriptions and I’d like to keep it that way.

      • foodandart@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        9 days ago

        My public library still checks out DVDs. Some titles are blu-rays even. Get an optical drive and rip away. For free.

        • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 days ago

          True that. I use both, Kanopy and physical from the library. I have a 42TB HPE server that has a ton of content. If it ever dies to where I can’t revive it anymore and all pirating sites are blocked, I’m fucking going back to the old days of dvd/blu-ray players. I will get me one of those portable ones like I had before and start watching. I’ll never pay them a fucking dollar.

          • Bryllyg@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 days ago

            Don’t forget thrift stores, you can get old media there super cheap and some thrift stores support good causes so you still aren’t giving money to the shitty companies but you are helping the thrift store survive and helping someone that needs it to keep a job.

            • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              Omfg, thank you so much for bringing that up. Totally forgot about this. Definitely first on the list.

  • UsernamesAreForSuckers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    This is what capitalism does. Its endless profit growth requirement is not possible under any real market conditions. So it inevitably starts squeezing it’s own customers and degrading it’s own service to maintain these unrealistic demands for profit. The more consolidated the market becomes, the worse the outcomes. Anti-trust was always a half measure. The problem is capitalism is inherently unsustainable and can only lead to negative outcomes for it’s products and services over time. Nothing can grow infinitely and that pursuit will always collapse bringing societal pain.

    • AdamBomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      I don’t think it’s really the fault of the economic system of capitalism exactly. There’s nothing about “private ownership of the means of production” that requires infinite growth. For that I blame Wall Street in particular.

      • balderdash@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Marx explains that the primary use of capital is to accumulate more capital. No one who invests money is satisfied with an equal or lesser value in return. Note that this is disanalogous to a direct exchange of goods. If I give you a coat and you give me a chair, we are satisfied with the trade because the use-values are heterogenous even though the exchange-value is homogenous and [if the trade is fair] equivalent. But there is no reason to exchange $100 for $100 because the two are the same. (This is not to say we should go back to the barter system: the point is that capitalist commodity production leads to capital, which leads to an expectation of infinite profits.) Once you have a pile of money, you can either sit on it or you can throw it back into the market in an effort to get more money.

        Marx argues that, under capitalism, money itself becomes fetishized, since the owners of private commodity production pursue ever greater profit. More precisely, they pursue more surplus-value to appropriate from the value created by the labor-power they purchase from workers.

      • UsernamesAreForSuckers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Name a time in history private ownership hasn’t metastasized into monopolies and imperialism. Wall Street as a financial hub didn’t even exist till 1817 and didn’t gain much hold on the world till far later. The first stock market was in 1611 in Amsterdam. British capitalism fueled British imperial rise before America even existed. Capitalism is just smaller fiefdoms under owner monarchs. It always exploits labor and slowly takes more and more power to oppress for its own gains. People are real quick to forget how awful businesses were to labor in the past. Union members died to get us the little we have they are again stripping away. Systems that centralize power with an unaccountable minority always do the same thing.

    • zemo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 days ago

      People are so normalized to ads. I have many, many friends who either use YT free and wait patiently for 2 x 1 minute apps before every video AND ad breaks. I tell them about adblockers and they laugh and say “they dont mind”. Or they play for YT premium and I tell them that adblockers exist and they say “i dont mind paying”. Genuinely blows my mind

  • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    9 days ago

    Imagine if people just stopped paying these companies. I guarantee you that most people have more entertainment than they can consume in their lifetime. They just want to have everything and these companies know it.