Hi! I (23M) am recovering from complex childhood developmental trauma. I’ve considered myself an outside observer to human society because I was unable to bond with or relate much to other people until this year.

I grew up in an environment with abusive parents where any kind of softness or vulnerability in men was considered “gay”. Subsequently, I encountered a lot of male peers in school who had the same attitude. It seemed like the entire world had the same message: wanting to be vulnerable as a man represents a sexual perversion because it is a “feminine” trait. I was bullied for the bits of vulnerability that I showed, echoing my abusive parents punishing my vulnerability. This sent me into a suicidal spiral that I thankfully made it out of.

I had this inexplicable desire to be vulnerable that I couldn’t suppress. It made me believe that I was somehow “gay” despite only being attracted to women, and that women who like men could never find me attractive because they were only attracted to “straight” masculinity – invulnerable, competitive, and dominating – consigning me to a permanent ontological friendzone. Ultimately, I decided to take the Faustian bargain of trading my sexual potential for the freedom to be soft, releasing me from the internal pressure to conform to patriarchy.

(To clarify, I was confused in a specific way where I thought “straight” = patriarchy and “gay” = anything that challenges patriarchy. I concluded that the latter was morally superior and adopted softness and progressive beliefs on purpose even though I falsely believed at the time that this would lead to my celibacy based on the right-wing echo chamber I grew up in.)

Through healing from my trauma and talking to friends years later, I’m starting to think that this belief was kinda bullshit? How can you avoid being vulnerable when merely existing in the presence of your partner opens you up to their potential judgement? How can you avoid being vulnerable when you ask someone out, knowing they can reject you? It’s almost like I actually didn’t want to be vulnerable despite thinking otherwise, and refusing to even appear in front of people actually made me the most invulnerable and therefore manliest man who ever manned, or something. Also, accepting my fate of being in the perma-friendzone led to me making a female friend who emphatically told me that I actually could find a girlfriend because I have this adorable charm and clumsiness that seems to make her instinctively want to baby me, which I always thought was the exact opposite of desirable. I’m slowly coming around to believing her after 6 years.

Most importantly, love requires both partners to be emotionally vulnerable, right? So then under gender roles, men can’t love women, only objectify them? Wouldn’t this make society one giant trauma factory where men are traumatized into detached sociopathy and women are traumatized into servitude? So what the hell are conservatives doing in relationships? Are they all loveless relationships, or did all of the men cheat their gender role to develop romantic feelings? If men didn’t cheat a little in the past decades where gender roles were the strongest, shouldn’t we see a kind of generational trauma so severe that violent crime is rampant and secure attachment is very scarce?

  • rawn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    My experience as a young woman was, that young men learned to be a different person, when not in front of their peers.

    This was pretty universal where I grew up. I was surprised how men from (some, not all) other cultures were so comfortable showing each other that they cared about each other. That didn’t necessarily make them better allies to women, but sometimes it did.

    None of this is good.

    I’m a big fan of showing vulnerability, but it really is a journey to do this not just in relationships or with friends but go beyond that.

    Good job on noticing that things can be better. Let’s make them so.

  • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Yeah, it’s a very flawed premise for healthy relationships. The best case scenario is you find a partner that can be your everything including essentially your confidant and therapist.

    In reality it leads to decades of repressed emotions and lashing out to loved ones because you can’t create or exist in a space where you can regularly and productively express yourself.

    One of the craziest true statements is the legalaziation of divorce led to a decrease in murdered husbands. The time of yore are full of gore as they say

  • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    3 days ago

    Historian here: People “back then” had the same brains we have, were as smart as we are and also were capable of feeling the same emotions as we are. And they totally were able to love. History is full of really awesome love stories. Letters of Note is a great resource to start exploring those emotions. They also have a book simply collecting love letters and you really might want to get this. The onslaught of love from historical people writing to each others will answer your question if men could have loved women back then. Just take a look at this letter of Richard Feynman writing to his dead wife and all the love and caring oozing out of it:

    https://news.lettersofnote.com/p/i-love-my-wife-my-wife-is-dead

    Those “traditional gender roles” the conservatives are pushing are not real. They were not real back then and are a power fantasy of bad people. There were gay people back then. And trans people. And men and women loved each others. Others were in loveless or abusive relationships. Go and read a few of those letters. They are awesome.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Most importantly, love requires both partners to be emotionally vulnerable, right? So then under gender roles, men can’t love women, only objectify them? Wouldn’t this make society one giant trauma factory where men are traumatized into detached sociopathy and women are traumatized into servitude?

    Yep.

    So what the hell are conservatives doing in relationships?

    Exactly what you just said.

    Are they all loveless relationships, or did all of the men cheat their gender role to develop romantic feelings?

    A little column A, a little column B

    If men didn’t cheat a little in the past decades where gender roles were the strongest, shouldn’t we see a kind of generational trauma so severe that violent crime is rampant and secure attachment is very scarce?

    *Looks around at the state of the world…* Yeah, sounds about right.

    (Most of that violent crime is in the form of unreported domestic violence, and that lack of secure attachment is masked by relationships held together by obligation.)

    Glibness aside, you’re 100% correct, and the reason you’re struggling is because oh boy is it hard to be slapped in the face by this realization all in one go.

    Is love possible under rigorously enforced traditional gender roles? Yes, of a sort, but it will never be healthy. It will never be truly free and alive.

    But when we say “traditional gender roles”, do note how I added the “rigorously enforced” there. Breaking out of the conservative mold does not require you to throw out the baby with the bathwater.

    I work in IT, I dress, look and act very masculine, I have a basement full of power tools, I know more than anyone should about guns, I play violent video games, I have a dog, I like to fire up the smoker on a Sunday and cook some ribs… There are plenty of ways that I fit the ideal of traditional male gender roles. And there are plenty of ways that I don’t. I could talk about the small ones, but the most significant would be that I’m bisexual, and I’m married to a woman who is in the army. And not, like, a clerk or something, she’s infantry. Could kick my ass ten times over, and I’m very comfortable with that.

    The thing about traditional ideas of gender is that once you understand that they’re bullshit, you’re no longer required to accept the bad with the good. You get to pick and choose what you want from the buffet. My wife is one of the toughest motherfuckers you will ever meet, and a lot of her interests skew more “manly”. She likes military history, she’s a gun nerd, she plays shooters and complicated strategy games. But she still likes to dress up pretty and put on makeup, and she still likes to curl up in my arms and be the little spoon. I can cry at sad movies, but I can also be the tall, strong man who will wrap her up in his arms when she’s sad or stressed.

    It’s not an either/or. It’s a whatever you want. Be the person you are most comfortable being, whatever that may. Because the best part is, when you are your most genuine self, people will be drawn to that. There is nothing, nothing more attractive than someone who truly knows who they are and gives zero fucks what anyone else thinks. The more you shed the rules that were imposed upon you, and the rules you imposed upon yourself, the more you grow into a version of you that makes you happy, the more people will be drawn to that. Don’t worry about trying to be someone else’s ideal. Be your own ideal. The rest will happen naturally.

  • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    3 days ago

    You’re deconstructing all this at 23, you’re a champ. That’s young to have so much perspective on the failings of your upbringing. Really, mad props. I have nothing to add, let your worldview shift to something more sane, more in tune with your intuition. Be manly and vulnerable ! ❤️

    • sprigatito_bread@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thanks, although my psyche is kind of forcing me to speedrun this awakening because every day of my life that I couldn’t form a secure attachment was incredibly painful. Like, imagine that you’re on fire for every day of your life since you gained consciousness. Then you discover the existence of water at age 21, and it takes 2 more years to find enough of it to put yourself out. And then you’re left with physical scars for the rest of your life due to the unholy amounts of stress you’ve been under the whole time. Don’t get me wrong, I’m so, SO glad to not be on fire anymore and this is literally the least horrible time of my life so far, but the lasting physical effects of being on fire for so long have radically altered my life trajectory to the point where I’m definitely going to need to lean on those secure attachments.

      If anything, I’m surprised that I haven’t heard this story from other guys — being so desperate for warmth and care that you frantically deprogram from your entire childhood and culture just to be able to say “I need help” or “I’m scared, please hold me.”

      I just don’t understand how lots of men find toxic masculinity or even misogyny remotely palatable. I couldn’t stand the idea of hurting people’s feelings for no reason. As a young child, when my dad expressed hatred towards women, I felt hurt and invalidated in my instinctive desires to hug them and be kind to them. I never developed malice towards women or a desire to subjugate them. I simply became attracted to cute, cuddly, affectionate women. Any kind of hierarchy or discrimination would just get in the way of the closeness I seek. I just see a woman I’m attracted to and get all blushy as I think “Hugs… warmth… safety…” I don’t see some kind of sex slave or asset, so I never understood the guys who talk about women like that.

      • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thanks, although my psyche is kind of forcing me to speedrun this awakening because every day of my life that I couldn’t form a secure attachment was incredibly painful. Like, imagine that you’re on fire for every day of your life since you gained consciousness. Then you discover the existence of water at age 21, and it takes 2 more years to find enough of it to put yourself out. And then you’re left with physical scars for the rest of your life due to the unholy amounts of stress you’ve been under the whole time. Don’t get me wrong, I’m so, SO glad to not be on fire anymore and this is literally the least horrible time of my life so far, but the lasting physical effects of being on fire for so long have radically altered my life trajectory to the point where I’m definitely going to need to lean on those secure attachments.

        Yea, the metaphor resonates with me.

        I just don’t understand how lots of men find toxic masculinity or even misogyny remotely palatable.

        I don’t know. Perhaps they don’t ? perhaps they’re hurting, right now. continually.

  • SkaraBrae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m not afraid to cry. I tell my friends that I love them. I have two teenage sons that I kiss goodnight, every single day. I am a disability support worker. I do regular mental health checks on family and friends because I know what it is to be depressed, and how one person caring can be the difference between living and dying. I hug… A lot. I am 49 years old and I am male…

    … Therefore, I must be gay. Please don’t tell my wife.

  • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    The stronger you are, the less afraid you need to be of getting hurt.

    The very strongest people are the ones willing to show the most vulnerability.

    The ones obsessed with showing how strong and invulnerable they are are actually the weakest and are basically putting on armor to hide it.

  • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    There’s a lemmy resident who made a video about this. He talked about the role men’s emotional deadness is shaped to play in relationships and how under this system we’re supposed to seek out women to experience our emotions through vicariously. Like, they experience beauty and sadness and joy and we just experience… them.

    It’s fucked up. It explained so much about why people in my life hated my emotions and what me showing them implied. Men and women deserve better than to be made to exist like that.

  • FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I reject the premise of your question

    The idea of “traditional gender roles” is bullshit, and the thought that men are not “allowed” to be vulnerable is absurd

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Agreed.

      I am a 38 year old man, sometimes we need to be vulnerable and emotional to get a release of pent up frustrations and other emotions.

      I tend to say that I am man enough to cry when I need to.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Swede here, oh, absolutely, at this point I don’t even want to visit the US, which is sad, there are plenty of cool museums and other stuff there

          • FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            I go there a few times a year, because I have to

            There’s so much to do, so many wonders of nature, but I wouldn’t be going there if I didn’t have to

            It’s an awful place

            Many good people, but too many absolutely dreadful people too

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        The only pain point to me is that we think of this as a man being willing to break down in tears; to say that things have hurt him.

        In my case, a lot of my repressed emotion is anger. I’m more than adamant that anger be directed solely to the horrible things in the world that deserve to receive it, and not the people close to you, but I perfectly understand that people (esp women) have reason to be scared around someone that can express so much anger, even if the claim is it will never be towards them.

        I think it’s perhaps easy, or even in some ways enjoyable, to be the shoulder someone else cries on, that they feel safe around. It’s probably harder to be the person in the room when someone is seething furious about a worldly injustice; even if that injustice isn’t targeted at the man in question, and the anger is directed at an unseen entity.

      • FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        They don’t function as healthy people

        They’re fundamentally fucked-up and should be disregarded as any sort of example other than a warning

          • FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            What you think of “traditional gender roles” isn’t real

            It’s very much a modern construct, and a stupid one at that

            It’s a great way for men to subjugate women though, so if you’re into that shit, I can see why you like the idea

          • sculptor0725@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            “Society” hasn’t survived in this state for millennia, it reeks of white supremacy to suggest there’s some monolithic thing the world over called “society”. The phenomenon OP is talking about has been a part of western european and especially American culture for a century or two, but other societies exist now and in the past

          • Katana314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            I mean, even the orthodox Christians don’t practice what they preach. Republican senators turn out gay. Priests fuck little boys. All through the ages, speakers of societal virtue have written all kinds of exceptions for themselves behind closed doors.

            Many households get to write their own history, present it in a kind manner; and so you get Sherlock Holmes’ terrible prediction that the idea of a peaceful countryside is an illusion; that there’s far more crime out there that goes unnoticed, even if their family record was that of a willing and happy Lord and Lady.

            We’re getting better about things. But the betrayals of humanity, and of the supposed “traditional roles” became a lot more visible.

          • 5too@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t think this has been the state of society for millenia.

            Tolkien had Frodo break down in front of Sam in Lord of the Rings. Sam literally carried him after. This was written not even a century ago, and wasn’t seen as all that remarkable or groundbreaking. Hell, it wasn’t unusual that they held hands, it was just a thing bros did.

            The current level of toxic masculinity is a new phenomenon, it’s not a feature of a stable society

            • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Well observed. It’s far from the only example. You can go back as far as the earliest written literature and find examples of male vulnerability. From Gilgamesh and Enkidu to Odysseus to so very many others. Jesus cries openly in front of his disciples. Judas kisses him as a greeting.

              The biggest shift happens in the 20th Century, as men grow increasingly afraid of being perceived as queer.

              With that being said, we should not fall into the trap of lionizing the past here either. Ancient Greece was spectacularly queer and spectacularly sexist. They also had their forms of strict gender roles, even between men who were openly fucking each other.

              Ultimately, strictly defined gender roles have always been a problem. Especially for women, who often get overlooked in these discussions when they’re framed in this particular way. It’s true that how those roles have been defined has changed over the decades and centuries, but it doesn’t erase our underlying tendency to constrain ourselves with definitions.

          • atro_city@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            Society has been good enough to survive.

            Just because something has survived doesn’t mean it’s good or healthy.

            The best we have doesn’t mean the absolute best.

            It’s quite simple.

  • Kaul@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    I often see posts from the LGBT community that make me feel… Envious? Almost like I’m missing out on something. The social stigma of being “gay” for having feelings must’ve really gotten to me growing up. I feel there’s a blockage in my brain and emotions that tells me I can’t be a silly, goofy, caring guy, so I default to being quiet and closed off. Almost like my true potential as a person is being surpressed by the thoughts of myself and the beliefs of those around me.

    I’ve thought about it, and I know I’m not gay, but as you describe in your post, there is some kind of societal disapproval around men having deeper emotions that I see in almost everyone around me, especially in myself. My dad and brother never vent, complain, cry, etc. They just wake up, go to work, and distract themselves the rest of the day. I can’t remember the last time I had a deep conversation with somebody other than my wife (we fortunately don’t have a “traditional” relationship in the sense of this post and can be vulnerable with each other). The last 2 times I’ve tried to communicate real issues with my dad, I’ve written real, detailed letters, which went completely ignored, twice.

    I completely see what you’re getting at. Traditional gender roles DO seem to make love impossible, and the hyper-masculine(?) somehow make an exception to reproduce. At least that would explain why I was born, but my family has shown little care for the mental health or wellbeing of myself or others. It’s almost like the societal pressure to get married and have children override the actual feelings of love for others.

    • sprigatito_bread@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I often see posts from the LGBT community that make me feel… Envious? Almost like I’m missing out on something. The social stigma of being “gay” for having feelings must’ve really gotten to me growing up. I feel there’s a blockage in my brain and emotions that tells me I can’t be a silly, goofy, caring guy, so I default to being quiet and closed off. Almost like my true potential as a person is being surpressed by the thoughts of myself and the beliefs of those around me.

      I felt the exact same way, but perhaps to a more toxic and reactionary degree. Being called “gay” so much caused me to believe that I was indistinguishable from a gay man, to the point where I was better off being homosexual since I would face the same amount of discrimination anyway (not true). In other words, I thought that as a guy, it’s worse to be straight and feminine than gay and feminine, because bigots think you’re gay in both cases, but in the former case, you also repel the gender you’re attracted to (based on the assumption that women universally find feminine men unattractive).

      At least that would explain why I was born, but my family has shown little care for the mental health or wellbeing of myself or others. It’s almost like the societal pressure to get married and have children override the actual feelings of love for others.

      I believe I was born for similar reasons. I think my parents had children because it was gratifying for their self-image and made them feel successful. They didn’t know how to create a safe or nurturing environment. Now they are disappointed that their kids didn’t turn out how they hoped, when it’s because they put no actual emotional labor into raising them and created two traumatized adults.

  • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Vulnerability is not a weakness. It’s the opposite. It shows you have the courage to open up to people.

    • ManfredMumpitz@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Being vulnerable is braveness. You’re brave enough to look inside you and try to accept everything you find there and learn to cope with it.

      Strong alphas are cowards. They don’t want to or aren’t able to do so and always will blame others for not being able to do so. They are sad because of this and therefore angry.

      Im a 39 y old male and i cant stand them anymore. Dont trust men who are never sad. They don’t now how to became happy in life because they don’t know themselves and therefore didn’t get the point of a good life.

  • daggermoon@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    I relate to a lot of what you wrote. I’m a man who is very introverted and very shy. I’d say I feel a deep pathological need to express vulnerability. I’m sexually submissive and I like expressing my feminine side as well. Being the less desirable male, my shyness sure hasn’t done me any favors. Just be yourself, masculinity and/or femininity can be what ever you want it to be. Besides, they’re ain’t nothing manliar than being yourself.

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Congrats on seeing thru the facade so young. It’s kind of ironic, the more a man “tries to be manly” the weaker they come off. It comes from a deep insecurity that they don’t think other people will view them as “strong” so they go out of their way to “appear manly” so they can prove to others and themselves that actually, they really ARE manly, cuz again, deep down they aren’t so sure.

    You can see this when a man gets hyper- offended if someone calls them gay. Someone who knows themselves, maybe even explored a little, and is super confident in who they are and what they like would not even think to be offended if someone calls them gay.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Your problem is the “traditional gender roles”. Traditions are crap because they don’t evolve. You aren’t traditional. Don’t look for traditional.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      how does one run a mile, put up a shelf, deal with grief, feel proud of one’s achievements, make pasta, dress nicely, be self confident…?

      it’s a process one achieves by doing. And like everything, it’s difficult at first and one makes mistakes.

      • AnarchistArtificer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, it’s a skill like any other. For a lot of men I have known, that process was only able to start taking place once they had people in their lives who were safe to do this kind of exploration around. It always feels clunky at first, but with enough practice, it can become a habit.

        And it does get easier too — especially because as you cultivate more healthy modes of being, it becomes easier to find people who help promote this kind of healthy vulnerability