• Sturgist@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    MY CLASSIC SCI-FI SOFT COVER BOOKS!!??!1

    Edit: MY CLASSIC CONSOLE COLLECTION?!

    The things I love the most don’t have RAM, or I already have them 🤷

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    What I’m surprised hasn’t happened yet is RAM ICs being recycled at the retail level. As in, you could bring in an old laptop or phone with 32GB of soldered RAM and it would be desoldered and sold for cash or possibly even soldered into a new device you buy from that retailer.

    I wonder how close we are to that business model arriving.

  • lengau@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I was supposed to get a device with 64 gigs of RAM later this year. I just got an email telling me that due to the RAM shortage they’ve cancelled the 64 gig version.

  • bonenode@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    329
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I think calling it a RAM shortage is a bit incorrect. It is not like we are running out of raw materials or something else in the supply chain is broken. It’s shitty AI companies buying RAM that is not existing yet with money they don’t have. Unfortunately there’s no good term for that, I guess.

    • kingofras@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      152
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s called Imaginary Economics.

      It tends to happen right before a capitalist system fails.

      • BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Is this a thing? Because what comes to mind for me is “the market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent,” which just happens sometimes

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        74
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        It tends to happen right before a capitalist system fails.

        How often does this happen that we can claim this correlation? 🤔

        • Venator@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          About once every 350 years… With a sample size of 3… 😅

          • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            So you’re saying which empires/systems exactly then?

            Spain perhaps? The Holy Roman empire?

            • Venator@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              I was averaging roman, British and Mongolian empires, based on Google AI summary, so take that with a pinch of salt 😅 🧂

        • kingofras@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          8 days ago

          It’s about to. The very nature of it, means you can only have a sample size of one.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            8 days ago

            And when do you predict this will occur? When should I have built my nuclear shelter so I know when to start building it?

            • kingofras@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              8 days ago

              Too late for that I’m afraid. It already happened. It just takes a while before the [citation needed] folks understand that past performance is not a guarantee for future success.

              • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 days ago

                Lol sure, any time now, just one more year bro, just one more year and it will collapse bro, promise.

                Maybe the usa will collapse a bit (because those people are often americans that don’t know there are other countries out there) but that’s another story.

                • kingofras@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  14
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  I highly recommend staying ignorant honestly. It’s a much lighter burden to carry than seeing all the datapoints and seeing the collapse as a certainty. Have a good life, seriously.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 days ago

          People can see the trends and see how it will probably break down in some way, the problem is that the market can stay irrational longer than we can stay solvent. It helps that these dipshits seem to have forgotten that money equals abstract resources and creating new resource issues that’ll certainly put pressure on them in a more direct way either through legislation or via sabotage of required infrastructure.

        • daddycool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s the biggest bubble seen to date. It has all the characteristics, and it will crash eventually.

    • dust_accelerator@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      8 days ago

      I like electron finance

      Their exact location cannot be pinpointed; instead, they exist in a probability cloud where they are likely to be found at any given time.

      That’s what this hype cycle is founded on. If I lend you $5, you have $5 you can lend further. Now, we each still have a right to $5, so we can lend that debt obligation again for $4.50. Now we have, somehow, a market value of $19.

      Until someone looks, then it’s probably 0.

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s a racket, plain and simple. There used to be laws against this sort if thing.

        Keyword: used to

        I hope that it was worth it, and that America is great again. Let me just check some news articles… Oh my

    • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Supply monopolization?

      Consumer fraud?

      Sherman Act cartel market manipulation.

      Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits price fixing and the operation of cartels, and prohibits other collusive practices that unreasonably restrain trade.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s shitty AI companies buying RAM

      It’s greedy manufacturers selling it all to them in the first place and other market segments be damned.
      I’m no AI fan but the manufactures aren’t angels either.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            The money is fixed. You getting a raise means the money has to come from somewhere- which means the boss taking a pay cut or the customers paying more.

            • 0x0@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Still not the same, i don’t work for any of those manufacturers - and if i did i sure as hell wouldn’t care if their CEOs got a paycut to benefit the consumers. Won’t someone please pity the CEOs…

              • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                I’m referring to the relationship between someone offering you more money for the same work the difference of which gets passed on to consumers.

                A few consumers are going to a business and offering more money for the same work. The consumer is the business’s boss just like your boss might offer you more money. You aren’t going to turn down the raise because it will hurt other consumers just like the business isn’t going to turn down the money even though it will cost other consumers more.

                and if i did i sure as hell wouldn’t care if their CEOs got a paycut to benefit the consumers

                I brought that up because that wasn’t going to happen. If you get a raise, your boss isn’t going to take a paycut to make it happen. The raise comes from the consumers.

  • melfie@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    213
    ·
    8 days ago

    The reason RAM prices went up 4x is that a massive amount of not-yet-manufactured memory was bought with money that doesn’t really exist to be put into GPUs that haven’t been made yet, to be installed in data centers that haven’t been built, powered by infrastructure that may never exist, to satisfy demand that isn’t actually there, in order to generate profits that are mathematically impossible.

    😎

  • doug@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Don’t be fooled: if RAM had the chance it would kill everyone and everything you’ve ever loved.

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      8 days ago

      i’d be willing to suffer another year of ram shortage if that meant all smart devices fucked off

      maybe we could even see actual physical buttons on devices again! i miss buttons and toggles

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      You think companies would cut off ad revenue and pass cost savings to customers?

      Fridges will get MORE expensive to ensure that you see ads on your fridge.

    • Big Baby Thor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      No, it means your smart fridge be AI enabled and you’ll have to prompt the goddamn door open.

      Also, it costs $3000 and it’s the cheapest model.

  • Australis13@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    8 days ago

    Frustratingly this is not just affecting the current generation of devices, but the previous one too. DDR4 RAM (which I use in my desktop) has gone up 300% since I bought it a few years ago.

    Here’s hoping that nobody needs to replace current or previous gen hardware if it breaks in the next 2 years…

        • Pazintach@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I, too, am glad that I added two more RAMs when they were cheap. Hopefully if one of them died, I can still have a decent machine in the foreseeable future.

          • Minnels@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            I bought some expensive ram back when i bought my current CPU to maximize Factorio and that was about 200 €. Don’t even want to know how much it would be today. Also cheaped out and bought 16Gb ram for my home automation server last summer for less than 50€. Regrets hits me now as more would totally be better.

            • njordomir@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Yeah, I maxed the gaming rig (for Cities Skylines) when I should have been maxing the server. I’ll be okay. I don’t need the extra ram, it’s just nice to have a buffer.

          • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Yeah even used ram is going for like 2x-3x the price I bought it at new. I just checked and similar capacity (4x 8GB) at lower speed (3200 compared to 3600) would cost me about 300-400€ now. And I paid about 70-80€ back then

        • bthest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Me too. But I learned a while back that my cpu or slots are fucked and I can only have one stick installed at a time.

          So I’m drowning in RAM that I cannot use. I could sell the RAM and get another motherboard but then I won’t have the RAM!

          It’s not fair… It’s not fair.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Many RAM producers have simply stopped producing DDR4, because it isn’t used in data centers.

  • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Going to be fucking hilarious when all the western companies get fucked by China taking over the market they don’t seem to care about.

    • jali67@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      They’re wealthy but absolute fucking morons. The people who fall for the “they have money so they must be smart” are such gullible buffoons. CCP is much more competent than American oligarchs, running what could’ve been great with better policy into the ground.

      • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s almost as if socialism makes for a better capitalistic system. It’s a lot better when the oligarchs fear the government rather than the government fearing the oligarchs.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      What’s your source for that. China has no more reason to invade Taiwan next year than they have at any point in the last 30 years

    • isaacblach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Don’t count on China. They are going to invade Taiwan next year and the global trade embargo will be a rounding error to the destruction of the tmsc factories during that war. Or they will capture the fabs and prohibit export to the US. Loose loose for us.

      • thethrilloftime69@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        7 days ago

        “China, a country that hasn’t invaded another country in 50 years, is going to invade this country” said the country that invades a country once a decade.

        • Kissaki@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          China claiming Taiwan is its territory and threatening invasion, the regular military “training exercises”, even including the specific goal of Taiwan landing operations, and continuous hybrid attacks for years already, like invasion of Taiwan waters with fishing vessels, and cyber attacks, and you’re sitting here claiming China isn’t a country that would invade others. What do you make of these kinds of activities, then?

          The what-aboutism deflection doesn’t work very well on an international comment section, either.

          • thethrilloftime69@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 days ago

            I’m not an expert on Chinese military policy. I just know that all of us living in the West have been told by our media and our government that China is bad for us. I know we see the world through the lens of war.

            • jali67@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I know you think it’s impossible other countries could be bad because the U.S. is held under a microscope and intensely critiqued both by foreign interests and specific groups here. The U.S. is far from perfect but pretending other countries like China would never do bad is absolutely comical.

                • Kissaki@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  I didn’t read their comment as defensive at all. Their comment ended not in defense but in questioning your original claim/original assessment. The sentence before that serves as reasoning for that.

        • jali67@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          The issue is not black and white like you people that barely got by high school make it out.

        • TronBronson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          China a country that has been trying to unify Taiwan since the civil war they couldn’t quite finish.

          • thethrilloftime69@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            When you live in the imperial core of one of the most militaristic nations in the history of the world, everything seems like a provocation.

            • jali67@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Ironic considering much of the world was constantly in conflict prior to Pax Americana.

              • thethrilloftime69@feddit.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                America has engaged in war the majority of the post world war 2 era. Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan twice, Iraq twice. And that’s not including all the proxy wars they’ve funded.

                • jali67@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Yes every instance was totally bad. The U.S. should’ve done nothing to counter USSR and their dominoes across the world. US should’ve just let every country fall into an authoritarian USSR influenced country.

                  Obviously, I don’t blindly think every war was good, such as Bush era Iraq. However, defending Kuwait was 100% defensible in Gulf War.

        • nialv7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          yes, because what happened in the past can perfectly predict what’s going to happen next.

          not saying you are definitely wrong, but if someone wants to have a bet i wouldn’t bet on the side of China not invading.

            • jali67@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 days ago

              Spoken like someone who is blinded by the Trump admin, obliviously naive. You must’ve been one of those that thought Russia would never invade Ukraine despite US intelligence.

                • jali67@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  No because you’re using your current “America bad” outrage to justify other countries and their expansionism. Other countries can be bad, you know? Many just were unable to do so under American hegemony.

        • ashar@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Technically and diplomatically, China and Taiwan are the same country

      • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t understand this thing about anyone destroying those factories for any reason. I don’t think that would happen.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      AI is the last great bubble.

      And it, like all bubbles, will pop.

      You are already seeing the people in the know flee the field.

      You see reports that every company that has adopted it has at best changed nothing, at worst lost money on it.

      Outside of the psychotic linked in CEO bubble, literally no one wants AI. And every day its generating more and more hate due to its halucinations, mistakes, and bullshit.

      Its garnering massive negative attention for its use, and for anyone stupid enough to adopt it at this point (cough intel cough)

      Its a dying star, and people are frantically trying to harvest the last bits of warmth from it before going off in search of new horizons.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I can only assume you haven’t used it for anything it’s good at lately. The truth is somewhere in the middle. Just like we still have websites after the dot com bubble, there will still be LLMs after the AI bubble pops.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          The only stories I’ve ever heard of involving AI are told by people who, once again, are unable to see how their increase in productivity is not being met with a reduction in work hours. Unless, or course, “reduction in work hours” means they are being shown the door so a different idiot can do kore work for the same amount of pay.

          Why does everyone feel the need to do as much as possible as quickly as possible at all times of every single day? And why are most people I talk to using ChatGPT to replace Google searches so they don’t need to actually think?

          We all need to slow the fuck down.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            worker productivity continues to climb ever higher, yet wages never grow with it.

            take someone from the 1950s office and ask them to do the same amount of work that an officer worker today does, and they’d quit on the spot. especially since they’d be paid less today than they were in the 1950s as far as buying power goes.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          No, I dont use it.

          I get enough hallucinations and blatant lies from biologicals, I don’t need an AI erasing a mountain to consume the coal underneath to tell me made up bullshit.

        • Sckharshantallas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Certainly, but hopefully you won’t turn on your PC and have 50 popups and 10 different buttons blinking and getting in the way of each other begging you to try AI.

  • enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    8 days ago

    I wish Sam Altman to encounter difficulties every time he had to use bathroom and increased chance of his phone fell to the toilet all the time.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m so glad I bought this book years ago

    I was saving it for a retirement hobby project but looks like I will have to open it sooner than I thought.

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      IDK at the current price trend, maybe we’re approaching a point where having sweatshops make ferromagnetic memory modules in GB sizes is feasible. I’d better start building a couple of hangars for my GPU memory.

  • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    7 days ago

    My most recent hobby has been an old Suzuki Samurai that I dragged out of the woods a few years ago. It doesn’t use much RAM. It doesn’t even have fuel injection.

    I’ve also been getting back into archery with my kid.

    Honestly, the more I think about it, the more I think that making it harder to get a computer and play games is a huge miscalculation. If everyone is distracted by Call of Battle: Dutyfield then you have fewer bored assholes casting about for something to do, and if people can still play Factorio, you don’t end up with bored, autistic, organized assholes casting about for something to do.