
Iran is a low bar to set, I think we can agree there.
My critique was really against tossing modesty in the trash as if it’s completely without value. A man being protective of his womenfolk is also seen as something bad, which is so irrational.

Iran is a low bar to set, I think we can agree there.
My critique was really against tossing modesty in the trash as if it’s completely without value. A man being protective of his womenfolk is also seen as something bad, which is so irrational.

I gave you the other end of the extreme, where there is no attention paid to the woman’s dignity.
The reason I brought this up was because it is something that I have seen be applauded. No one said, “hum, maybe we shouldn’t let women be in a vulnerable position in front of tyrannical cops”.
If you don’t see an issue here, then you can’t really claim to care about the dignity of women, and that says something about you.

But there is still pressure, otherwise a woman would not have been driven to go to the street to protest nude.

People think differently. Just because you don’t see yourself being content with wearing a full veil on a sunny beach does not mean that another woman can’t be.

Removed by mod

She should be like those lefty heroines who get arrested naked by the police.
I looked at the title of this post and thought “this seems rather innocuous, let’s click”.
Then I noticed the black figure at the bottom. Ah, so this is what this shit is about.
Why do everyone on this site seem to be an angry sperg? If someone wants to be modest, why do you get your panties in a bunch?

LMAO
Maybe they were going to play after finishing up the dishes?
This shitty interpretation says more about the person making the “meme” than the artist who created the original ad.
It’s grotesque enough to still be a problem, I’m sure. Perhaps the laws haven’t caught up to stunts like these and that’s why they are getting away with it?
We all age and die. What matters is what we do with our lives.
a random consumer*
Thanks to all the influence operations, surveillance, AI slop, malicious scrapers, spam and bad-faith ideologues (from all sides).
Edit: typpo

We many times lament when the government overreaches. This is the kind of Trojan horse that enables the government to overreach.
One might think, this seems innocuous and beneficial, so go ahead, right? You have to ask yourself, how is it moral for the government to, with the threat of violence, force every home to be built with solar panels? Because that’s the implication.
If I’m a small business, and I build a house without solar panels, is it right that I be bankrupted or/and be put in jail?

Nailed it.
Just look at Barrack “Black Drone Operator” Obama, and Joe “Sniff Sniff” Biden who is a blatant Zionist who acted chocked and insulted when he was called a Palestinian (I believe by Trump). Both supporting the violent occupation of Palestine, of course.

deleted by creator

bb👋

sensitive
You’re the one being sensitive. Lol.

It depends on who the male character in the comic is supposed to be. If it’s in that setting, then yeah I can imagine it happening.
I was thinking about MGTOWs and internet personalities who use words like “high value male/female”, and my interpretation of this comic is that this is supposed to be satire of them. If that’s what the comic artist was going for then, I believe my criticism is deserved.
If it’s referencing immature men saying “I wouldn’t even date you” to women they actually find attractive, well, I haven’t seen it myself but I can imagine it happening. That’s however not what I was thinking about addressing this comic.
The comic is a bit ambiguous about what it’s talking about specifically.

I think the problem is that you think I’m arguing in bad faith, and I’m not. Nor is anything that I said that controversial.
No offense, but I think you really need to touch some grass.
Imagine calling a house a pod.