I think worrying about something that’s an unknown risk while ignoring the very real known risk is somewhat illogical. Especially since I’d imagine there are more than 2 possible solutions for a problem like this. Also this assumes that the produce wouldn’t end up being packaged in some form of plastic at some point before arriving to the consumer anyway.

You have clearly never actually done “hard sciences” research in any meaningful way if this is your take. And computer science does not count as a science at all, it is more like engineering. Mathematics is a “hard science” that can be implemented through computer science, and physics is a “hard science” that can be implemented through electrical engineering (and as a subset computer engineering).

But even then mathematics is closer to philosophy and logic than any of the physical sciences. The physical sciences like physics, chem, bio are very different due to their experimental nature, and how sensitive they can be to specific conditions of the experiments. And the more complex the system being studied is, the harder it is to control variability which is why the social sciences like psychology and economics are working on incredibility difficult problems in systems we do not currently fully understand, and are more vulnerable to difficult reproducing and replicating the conclusions.

This is in contrast to computer science where we fully understand the system because humans have built it, and it is a machine built on the principles discovered by physicists and implemented by electrical engineers to run calculations that are created by mathematicians.

Sorry, just meant that for biochemistry it was the “lowest level” you could take. It was usually a 3rd or 4th year class. Anything 4000+ level for us was a graduate school level class. I was just saying I had the same experience as you to some degree but it’s possible different schools/professors have different expectations.

This may be a university to university and course to course difference too. My intro 3000 level biochem class didn’t have us memorize structures but my 5000 structural biochem class did and certain nucleic acid structures and stuff. Can’t remember shit now but I definitely had to memorize them at some point in undergrad.

I assumed they’re not reusing bags, but I guess I’m not sure

Is there a photo attached I can’t see?

Also sometimes guitar center sells used kits

I was also confused about what Microsoft has to do with women being seen in their homes 🤣

Dang even fiction writers shitting on social sciences now

Probably because parks and museums usually just close whenever this happens, so they’re not working without pay. They’re just on an indefinite suspension

I recently learned that even a lot of middle-high end interior designers will buy IKEA products (particularly their customizable built ins), and then modify/paint them for a more bespoke look. So possible that they will have clients there as well.

This is crazy. I wonder what the context was for making up reviewers. Because it sounds like the paper would’ve maybe still been published without the fake reviewers

I agree with medium gray’s interpretation

If you change your orientation, this could still be clockwise

I think the joke is if there were more autistic people in charge of those things, the accidents wouldn’t happen

I just always say P-N-A-S

It is most likely this. OP is one of the unfortunate people that just cannot use marijuana safely due to his biology. If you have cannabinoid hyperemesis, best to stay away from weed because the constant nausea/vomiting can lead to unintentional weight loss and a lot of other physical problems that are no fun.

I’m addition to convenience Amazon has just killed off a lot of retail options. The only competitor left with brick and mortar is Walmart and somewhat best buy for electronics. Very hard to find those small specialty stores nowadays for little random things unless you live in a big metropolitan area. Even stores like Walmart now will have the same products by a million different brands instead of having an actual variety of products.

Except most state/local governments do have property taxes on houses, land, and cars. Not unrealistic to apply the same towards other assets. Specially since taxing homes and cars is counterintuitive because you’re taxing necessities, while taxing monetary/investment assets like stocks would make more sense to encourage more spending instead of just hoarding the money.

There’s a white color. You can tell they erased it from the legend