So how many frames is this, do we think, just for this clip…
- 0 Posts
- 15 Comments
You can be a professor of a thing, for example. You don’t have to be the thing.
primal_buddhist@lemmy.worldto
Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml•Euler diagram of the terminology of the British Isles
51·2 years agoI think if you are a part of those three then you are automatically part of GB
primal_buddhist@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•The UK tries, once again, to age-gate pornographyEnglish
11·2 years agoIt’s about the latter but it doesn’t have to work, just looks like you took action to solve a Daily Mail agenda…
Difficult but legally required by them, including establishing your bona fides.
primal_buddhist@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•The Pentagon is moving toward letting AI weapons autonomously decide to kill humansEnglish
4·2 years agoReally? Like where are you thinking about?
primal_buddhist@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•The Pentagon is moving toward letting AI weapons autonomously decide to kill humansEnglish
85·2 years agoBoomers have been in power for a long long time and the technology we are debating is as a result of their investment and prioritisation. So am not sure they are very afraid of it.
We can condemn Hamas and Israel in the same breath. We don’t have to support Israel as the agency to “remove” Hamas.
primal_buddhist@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Running Signal Will Soon Cost $50 Million a YearEnglish
2·2 years agoCould be that that is employee headcount and not including contractors.
primal_buddhist@lemmy.worldto
News@lemmy.world•Desalination system could produce freshwater that is cheaper than tap water
4·2 years agoDepends if they also evaporate.
Because the notes are in markdown, so are portable forever even if Obsidian went away.
primal_buddhist@lemmy.worldto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•People of Lemmy, I dare you to name ONE billionaire that's done anything good.
61·2 years agoWell, not to diss on giving to charity but two technical arguments against. One is, you are acting as an additional tax on the worker (the source of the surplus) and then redirecting that tax to charity. It’s fine but the elected government has democratically selected priorities that they can rarely fund so it is better to just give it to the treasury. And 2, just don’t collect this tax in the first place, allowing the worker to spend it on the local economy.
primal_buddhist@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Bosses mean it this time: Return to the office or get a new job! — As office occupancy rates stagnate, employers are giving up on perks and turning to threatsEnglish
2·2 years agoYes, we can still go in but now we have measured the difference and can judge what it would take to make it worthwhile.
primal_buddhist@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Bosses mean it this time: Return to the office or get a new job! — As office occupancy rates stagnate, employers are giving up on perks and turning to threatsEnglish
10·2 years agoThis is the key, and it cuts in different ways and needs planning strategy.
If we don’t go into town, then the businesses associated with going to work in town are in trouble, so coffee, lunch, snack, may as well get a book, after work drinks and then late food. All have less customers. Some of whom are themselves!
So a spiral of decline, less retail jobs in town, less secondary and tertiary employment “in town”.
Theoretically we can now spend some of that money locally IF the local has the supply and this is where political strategy is needed to replan where we sleep as always where we spend our casual cash. And in many cases these dormitories are not well planned for that.
So unfortunately we need to wait out this next phase of resistance in order to build political consensus for zoning and planning for more sustainable local hubs.





Too many bits of a smartphone are proprietary hardware without open drivers.