- 1 Post
- 14 Comments
I know. It’s still baffling how much it messes up when adding two numbers.
they are both shit at adding and subtracting numbers, dates and whatnot… they both cant do basic math unfortunately
but github copilot came out right around that time…
yes! this! is chatgpt intelligent: no! does it more often than not give good enough answers to daily but somewhat obscure ans specific programming questions: yes! is a person on SO intelligent: maybe. do they give good enough answers to daily but somewhat obscure ans specific programming questions: mostly
Its not great for complex stuff, but for quick questions if you are stuck. the answers are given quicker, without snark and usually work
the good thing if it gives you the answer in a programming language is that its quite simple tontestvif the output is what you expect, also a lot of humans hive wrong answers…
and copilot and chatgpt give good enough answers without being unfriendly
focus@lemmy.filmto
Movies and TV Shows@lemmy.film•The Barbie Movie: 4 out of 5 starz. funny weird and entertaining. Even for someone who never played with barbies. go it check it out.English
10·3 years agodid you even watch the movie?
focus@lemmy.filmto
Movies and TV Shows@lemmy.film•Oppenhimer review: 3 out of 5 starz. Go see it in theaters, but lower your expectations.English
2·3 years agotenet was way worse in the sound department, i didn’t understand a sinle word, while oppenheimer was ok-ish
focus@lemmy.filmto
Movies and TV Shows@lemmy.film•‘Oppenheimer’ Review: Christopher Nolan’s Epic Thriller About Father Of The Atomic Bomb Is As Frightening As It Is Brilliant
4·3 years agojust watched it in a barbenheimer combo. the dialogue wasn’t as clear as in barbie, but much better than tenet! So still ‘nolany’ dialogue, but well watchable without subtitles.
focus@lemmy.filmto
Science@beehaw.org•[Arxiv Preprint] Betelgeuse to go supernova in in decades (not centuries)
2·3 years agocool, thanks i didn’t know that
focus@lemmy.filmto
Science@beehaw.org•[Arxiv Preprint] Betelgeuse to go supernova in in decades (not centuries)
0·3 years agoI might be absolutely wrong though, I don’t really know anything… I just checked how far away it is… but if it has gone supernova already, then we might have a chance to see it? That would be amazing.
focus@lemmy.filmto
Science@beehaw.org•[Arxiv Preprint] Betelgeuse to go supernova in in decades (not centuries)
0·3 years agoAccording to google it’s 642 Light years away. As in, it takes 642 years until the light reaches us. So you probably won’t live to see it.


It’s pretty hit or miss though… I’ve had lots of good calculations with the odd wrong one sprinkled in, making it unreliable for doing maths. Mostly because it presents the result with absolute certainty.