dp

rainfurrest comes to mind, though there have been others that likely also qualify

I never had children because I didn’t want them to have to experience this shithole timeline. The conservatives and birthers can try if they want to make up for the population’s general abdication of parenthood, but for those of us that refuse to play the slavery game, it won’t really matter at our ends anyway.

Holy raging badgerfuck, that’s Insanity Wolf advice right there. When I quit, it felt like the universe was using every gram of the Laniakea Supercluster to split my head open.

I’d say both are involved, but of the two, far more the latter than the former.

My observation is that generally speaking, poor countries tend to be conservative politically; and where the country is richer than the statistically poorer countries, the conservative group within tend to be poorer per capita.

My guess (and that’s all it really is), is that procreation factors very heavily into the conservative religious ethos, and in that it appears that religion will be heavily rooted in poorer nations/socioeconmic areas, having(or making) (as many) children (as possible) is a god-given mandate.

Doesn’t matter the conditions into which children are born because they will follow the will of god and live in eternal happiness after death. The misery they endure here on earth will be forever forgotten in the joys of their afterlives.

This is, at least, how it seems to me, and is just my opinion.

Damn that backpack looking spacious af

Less cheese = fewer holes Fewer holes = more cheese Less cheese = more cheese

less cheese = more cheese = less cheese = more cheese → ∞: infinite cheese glitch

What difference would that make?

that comment is all skull and no brain

This reminds me of the paradox of Buridan’s donkey.

Godammit! The car didn’t deserve this.