https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss_(Ctrl%2BAlt%2BDel)

Turns out, there is actually a Wikipedia article about this, which is hilarious 😂

😫

Why is always loss?

Oh, I do the same thing, I use the same extension that you do, it just doesn’t fit my use case for multiple profile management.

I can let my kids play on my computer without them screwing up my personal browser history or getting into any of my accounts without having to teach them how to use yet another extension.

Vivaldi has a great example of profile management where I can literally create a desktop shortcut for each person that uses my computer, complete with their name, and it’s their own separate internet profile.

Yes, I’m aware I could solve this problem by using multiple user profiles on my computer, but the overhead and the amount of management would also be a massive headache. It is just far easier to do this.

Finally! Profile management is easily the worst feature in firefox

Only an idiot would think this is political.

Next you’ll be telling us that declaring your religion is political.

It’s always been awful. We have always sacrificed the homeless and the poor on the altar of “political progress”. It’s pretty par for the course in the United States.

It’s particularly egregious, though, when it’s done by a United States sitting president. Especially for the incredibly petty reasons he’s doing so.

Sacrificing the homeless on the alter of distraction. Foder for the powerful.

Fucking awful

Reddit too

Evidently not well. Seems like they don’t want you to retire according to the article

Idk it kinda feels like the implication is that if you have due process, then this would be okay. I’m firmly in the camp that nobody should be shipped to an El Salvador Gulag for any reason

Hey, I don’t care about the reason as long as it helps the cause.

stagflationary environment that economists were predicting a few months ago: mediocre growth, a weakening labor market, and rising prices.

Yeah, that tracks.

Probably could have left out the words “without due process” because they should not be throwing people into an El Salvadorian gulag.

Good to know. Thanks for the additional info

Now, it’s not my fault you can’t read, nor did the proper work to understand the 200,000 number, where it came from, and when it was released.

This is so fucking cute of you to use the Wikipedia number of 60,000, which has been heavily disputed, and then try to claim that this 200,000 number occurred only during the Trump administration. The Lancet had already released before Trump had gotten elected a notice or an article about how the death toll was significantly undercounted. In fact, a majority of the NGOs involved in that area since about 2024 have been screaming about how there is a famine going on and how this is a genocide.

https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/gaza-strip-ipc-acute-food-insecurity-november-2023-february-2024-december-21-2023

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Famine_in_Gaza?wprov=sfla1

But because you’re so wrapped up in liberal propaganda, you wouldn’t know that this famine has been ongoing for almost two years and has only just recently moved into its worst phase, phase five. Did you know there are four other phases before that? I wonder which President allowed those four phases to occur.

The fact of the matter is, Joe Biden allowed a genocide to happen, unrequitedly, and then lied to the American public about it.

https://internationalpolicy.org/publications/the-biden-administrations-false-history-of-ceasefire-negotiations/

You might be able to make an argument that for the American people, a Democrat administration might have been better, but for the Palestinians, it would have been the same.

Besides, this goes to my point that if the democrats hadn’t been so fucking genocidal towards the Palestinians, they might have won the 2024 election, but who fucking knows?

It’s almost like I’m advocating for the position that the majority of the constituents the Democrats represent actually want and not the bullshit they keep feeding us.

So, let me make sure I got this right. Biden lowered the ACA premiums not by forcing the insurance companies to charge a lower premium, but by giving those insurance companies and the people they represent tax credits and from allowing those who take advantage of the ACA to take less from their income tax.

Yeah, this definitely represents the government option that he used to run on in 2020. Definitely helped a bunch of people who already couldn’t afford healthcare. Im sure this did alleviate some pressure, but it doesnt affect the majority of people and, these tax credits are set to expire so it’ll end up being a wash.

I got a good chuckle out of that, thank you. 🤣

I mean, that’s fair. I guess you could consider trans to be an attribute you’re born with, but I generally consider trans to be a part of our gender expression, which science has described as being incredibly fluid which is why we not only have trans people, but we also have genderfluid people, and non-binary people, and other varieties along that spectrum as well.