Decent game to quit about 30h in because while it’s good and fun to play, it’s incredibly repetitive.
- 1 Post
- 196 Comments
Science and academia, too. There’s way too few papers being published about failed experimemts. “I thought A, so I did B in order to achieve C, but it didn’t work out because of D.” is a very useful result.
bob_lemon@feddit.deto
Texas@lemmy.world•8,000 seat TX church attendance after lead pastor (Trump's spiritual advisor) busted for pedophilia
51·2 years agoA suit seems like good attire for a showmaster and/or business man
bob_lemon@feddit.deto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What is an underrated/forgotten video game that you think deserved a second chance?
3·2 years agoEverspace 2 is really close in terms of combat and overall gameplay, but it lacks the immersive simulation aspects. Freelancers idle radio chatter did some heavy lifting back in the day.
bob_lemon@feddit.deto
PC Gaming@lemmy.ca•Cozy hobbit game Tales of the Shire won me over with a subtly brilliant feature I've never seen in a farm life sim before
10·2 years agoThe path of grace is literally a giant yellow floating laser pointing in a general direction. It’s not precise, but “subtle” is not exactly the word I would use.
bob_lemon@feddit.deto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What popular product do you think is modern day snakeoil?
161·2 years agoBack when a 4 minute song was like 1.5MB so you could fit more music on your 256MB mp3 player because you could not afford an iPod.
bob_lemon@feddit.deto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's an idea you have that should be an actual thing?
1·2 years agoThere’s the federal volunteer service, which is the spiritual successor. Basically the same thing, but without being forced into it. There also voluntary social or ecological years, which is kind of the same thing as well.
Maybe try getting an MEP for Greens/EFA or the Left?
Also, why should we hail the size of energy drink cans?
Isn’t the master branch the submissive one? Always behind, getting force fed content from the other branches.
bob_lemon@feddit.deto
Gaming@beehaw.org•Weekly “What are you playing” Thread || Week of June 2nd
1·2 years agoAlways a great game to get back into. Or get into in the first place.
The latest patch was kind of disappointing and I hope they do tweak some of the issues, but I’m still looking forward to the new expansion reveal tomorrow. The teasers were pretty neat so far.
bob_lemon@feddit.deto
Technology@lemmy.world•Stealing everything you’ve ever typed or viewed on your own Windows PC is now possible with two lines of code — inside the Copilot+ Recall disaster.English
38·2 years agoIf the IT departments of any major corp allows anyone within their network to enable this feature, they and everyone the work for need a permanent waning label for idiocy and utter incompetence attached to their resume.
bob_lemon@feddit.deto
Mildly Interesting@lemmy.world•The difference that proper air/fuel mixture makes.
3·2 years agoThat looks like it is made from compressed lint
bob_lemon@feddit.deto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Any iOS users seen the top 100 albums of all time?
3·2 years agoThe catalogue seems largely identical to Spotify, but Tidal has higher quality music (I recently found an album in Dolby Atmos).
I also found their app to be more intuitive (which is not exactly a high bar compared to Spotify).
Most importantly though, Tidal has better rates for the artists instead of paying Joe Rogan.
They did a video about alternatives to Adobe a while back. And while they generally liked and praised programs such as Affinity, they did conclude that as a company, even minor losses in productivity (e.g. for their editors) quickly add up.
So yeah, it would not be the first time they present and praise alternatives even of they don’t end up using them.
bob_lemon@feddit.deto
Science Memes@mander.xyz•Is there another way to do it...?English
23·2 years agoThere was a specific number that was repeated across a lot of papers in my field, always citing the same source.
That source did have the number, but it cited another paper for it, which itself cited yet an older paper. Im not sure where the citations went bad, but that last paper for not actually contain the value everyone waschain-attributing to it.
The number was fortunately still correct though (and people would have noticed pretty quickly if it wasn’t).
In other words, the question becomes: “Is an egg defined by the creature that laid it, or the creature that will hatch from it?”






I was curious and still read the article. It’s far far worse than I ever imagined.