You’re stuck in a loop here.

I wouldn’t ask you to back up your claim because the Jags are doing well.

Again, you can’t prove a negative. And the burden of proof (or at least credible evidence for) is on the person making the claim.

You’re making the claim. Back it up.

Can I prove what?

No, but that alone doesn’t affect if they will be in the future.

They are also different people each year.

The Cowboys have played in almost as many super bowls as any team, but if you bet on them to win this year you should have your head examined.

They’re 10-4, first in their division, 3rd in the AFC. They’re not my first choice to win the Super Bowl, but I wouldn’t bet against them either.

I’m not sure a simple “what is your evidence” is coming at you hard. But okay…

if you said that I would see they have a very good record right now (evidence) and wouldn’t wonder why you are saying that.

If you claimed the Titans were going to win, I would indeed wonder and ask for your reasoning.

Evidence can’t prove a negative.

I have no idea what today’s economy would look like under Harris, but I’m not the one making a claim.

On what evidence do you support that theory?

It’s been 10 years since the iPhone had the headphone jack. Move on. Again. It’s a tired meme from at least 5 years ago.

Yes, at least iPhones have. Ignoring the purpose built iPhone Air this year, the standard and pros all have gained body thickness (objective) since the thinnest iPhone 6. Also increased or remained the same absolute battery capacity (objective) and batter life (subjective) every year since 6.

Meme is a perfectly reasonable argument in 2019.

Outdated meme is outdated.

Minecraft server.

I remember learning about Shamir’s secret sharing, and indeed the concept is fascinating. I’m not sure passwords is the best use case of something like that, but I’m not completely against it in theory.

So your solution to password theft is to make sure other people have them?

Counter with a demand for a bribe not to investigate Trump. Then investigate him anyway. What possible jurisdiction could such an “agreement” even be upheld?

Herd immunity isn’t for those who won’t get vaccinated, it’s for those who can’t.

It’ll certainly win the republican primary.

I mean, I’d still call 1 out of 10 people dying “high impact.”

Surely you mean 2A?

If I’m using it in browser, sure. But as a standalone application, no comparison IMO.