Thank you for your work.

As far as I understand it one of the big advantages is that every viewer simultaneously provides its download data for others to stream (peering). With this approach server capacity can be reduced but I wonder how well this works (If I even understood it correctly).

With this system could it be possible to host videos on an own server without having to pay huge sever costs?

Also what is a nice website to search through all videos, similar to the front page of YouTube?

Ha thanks!

Full resolution image and more details here

Also this is what our setup looks like to shoot such an image:

I can recommend this online telescope simulator where you can simulate the field of view with your equipment. Your 300mm lens should be absolutely perfect

This lens is incredibly sharp and produces nearly no coma. Also the image is super flat and the lens also works for full frame cameras. For its high image quality it‘s also used by some more advanced astrophotographers.

As I bought it new for 400€ this was a no brainer because we can also use it for ‘normal’ photography.

I‘m sure your lens works well for many nebulae!

Thank you! Andromeda is way bigger than most people think. That’s the reason why it is a very (maybe the most) popular target for beginners. Also there went a lot of processing into the image, so don’t let the image deceive you from the actual conditions where I live (Bortle 5 zone)

The lens is the telescope in this case. But as the focal length of 135mm is fairly short it works best for objects appearing very large in the sky. Astrophotography can get very expensive very quickly, so we try to make the most out of the equipment we have. Just like with the 3d printed mount.

The Samyang 135mm f2.0. In some markets it‘s also called Rokinon

Thank you! I agree, it really is an amazing topic.

Glueing and screwing the parts:

One result shot with this mount (and many other accessories):

Thanks :)

Ahh, thanks!

The surface is very rough as we don’t have the right tools to achieve a smooth finish. As it is very rustic we just leave it as

Yes that’s true, and I think at least in this case the imperfections are acceptable because the desired look was to feature the organic look of the wood. At least it’s a good excuse for the lack of woodworking skills

Thanks, yes there is a very thin sheet of plywood attached at the bottom of each disk. The disks themselves where completely dried before of course

Thanks! There is one anker point at the top with an dowel in the wall. The rest is fairly stable as one piece

Thanks! No the wood isn’t treated in any way

Thanks!

Thanks! With this focal length the star adventurer is more than sufficient.

Since people are commenting this image is „fake“ or „ai“, here is the same scene shot from a similar location with a cheap smartphone: