• 0 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 9th, 2023

help-circle




  • I don’t listen to or follow any of the sources on the chart, and I don’t like politics. That said, as a passerby I thought it was an interesting chart. One thing I thought about, the legacy media that is highly manipulated in my opinion is dominated by so-called left and the pseudo independent in my opinion voices in red on the chart are dominated by so-called right.

    I believe most people no longer trust the legacy media and are turning to just about anything else as an alternative.

    I think most people mistakenly think that some of these voices in red are independent of or not affected by persuasion, coercion, other. Some of these voices in red are also potentially literal government agents.

    All that said, I also find it interesting that there are not more blue dots: pseudo independent so-called left voices.

    Does this mean that the so-called left audience is captive to the legacy media? And/or does this mean that the so-called left audience does not trust independent voices?

    I will check some of the comments to the original post to see if anybody has thoughts on that.

    Anyways, thanks for your time.



  • basketugly@lemmy.worldtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldSo proud!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    Maybe it’s that there is nothing wrong with a man explaining something that he is excited about and that there is also nothing wrong with women feigning attention in these situations because it’s a social response to promote group thinking as opposed to individual effort?

    Maybe it’s only natural and we don’t have to hate ourselves for it? Sure you might not be happy to play that role every single time, but you don’t have to because you are free to choose.

    Also, you can isolate yourself from other people if you do not wish to have discourse with men or women that will no doubt involve them explaining things to you that they are passionate about or excited in the moment.

    I would certainly not criticize the woman or the man for these behaviors because I see it as human.



  • That’s cool and I would say I mostly agree, I am also going to add a couple specific pointers that I consider practical: use ChatGPT on a desktop in a browser, use VS Code and extensions, keep ChatGPT instructions OFF the CLI so you don’t end up in a loop of running CLI codes and reporting back to your SupervisorGPT, make deals with ChatGPT in terms of complete code files and check every line, run midnight commander in a separate terminal and pay attention to permissions and ownership, force ChatGPT into lock down checklist mode and force it to go step by step, focus on the BIG picture with ChatGPT and don’t let it runoff to the next shiny object before you completed and tested everything that you wanted to do and hardened before you listen to the next bullshit suggestion prior to project completion. It’s not all bad and it does help you learn and punch above your weight class, but it can be downright infuriating and is by no means a turnkey solution: my two cents. Nobody going nowhere doing nothing.



  • I have tried vibe coding on a couple small hobby projects and it did not workout in any of the cases, zero out of 4 or 5 ish attempts. It will get you kind of close, but it takes way way too long and it doesn’t work so you are actually just getting started. Are there actually techniques to vibe coding or is this all bullshit? I don’t want to spend more time looking into it…




  • It apparently is human nature to select leaders who are susceptible to corruption and incentivized to propagate the corrupt systems. I believe we need a solution where we have full traceability and hold leaders accountable, I have never seen anything close to this in my lifetime. Perhaps it is because we have collectively left the wolves to guard the henhouse? Replace the wolves with dogs who are aligned with human best interests.


  • No one knows what happens when you die, things could get worse after death and in that case suicide is not a solution but rather a next step towards something even worse.

    Given that it is currently impossible (as far as I know) to know what happens at death, the decision to suicide is an uninformed decision of tremendous magnitude.

    If by killing yourself things get worse, what would be the next step?

    Would you be in a better position to turn things around in the afterlife (assuming that there is one) or now in this life?

    In summary, the reason why you should not kill yourself is because you do not know what will be the result of that action your death: your death is not a guaranteed solution to anything.