• 0 Posts
  • 48 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2025

help-circle
  • ITT person still believing we didn’t have “a good one”.

    Personally and professionally, I have gone through tasting the world’s best and finest (but also craft and rare) in beer, wines, and numerous other alcoholic drinks, for example.

    They all absolutely stink and I hate them. Everyone who tried to convince me otherwise (and trust me, I’ve had a lot of “you just didn’t try THIS” moments that I had to settle once and for all by trying this horrible something) failed miserably, because you can’t pour me some piss and convince me it’s good, no matter the eloquence.

    P.S. ironically the absolute hatred for these things is what sometimes landed me on this professionally. I’m a sniper detector of several wine and beer components, because they all taste horrible and make me feel bad, much before anyone else notices anything. Nowadays, I get to decline such offers, but I had to do it for the money, yes.





  • While there are tasty things that are not water, water is seriously and systematically underestimated.

    Yes, it has a taste, y’all just destroyed your senses with hyper-sweetened, or sour, or bitter drinks. Depending on the source, water can be mildly sweet, slightly salty and rocky, or anything else. It compliments every possible meal as it doesn’t interfere with it, and it can be actually refreshing. A glass of cold pure water can invigorate, freshen, and give you strength to carry on. If it has the right salt content, it can also feel extremely light in a way no other drink can. It’s very satisfying.





  • You seem to spew out stamp after stamp before reading something I wrote and stressed several times. I think this contributes to errors way more than anything else. If you care about being correct, reading comprehension is the first priority.

    I always verify my understanding by going back to the books, and following through with filled gaps, checking how adequate my comprehension is against what comes next in human-written, academic texts. With one point following the other, the wrong understanding shows itself very quickly. And yes, that did happen. The books allow me to refine and clarify my understanding before making use of it.

    Primary sources are the basis, and are my main source of information. LLMs are there to fill the gaps that are otherwise very hard, if not impossible, to fill manually. They help connect the dots when the connection is unclear.


  • First off, I’m pursuing PhD, not MD, so you won’t be my patient. I’m a microbiologist.

    Second, as I thought I very clearly articulated, I do not offload thinking to LLM nor I ask it to provide me with all the answers. I follow original sources, and if you’ve ever followed scientific literature beyond student handbooks, you know that authors tend to omit things they consider obvious, leaving the reader with a gap of crucial knowledge that they don’t know how to close. This happens to the best of scientists, and it can take months to resolve, or it may never be solved at all, especially if the original author has already retired or passed away, or doesn’t answer on known communication channels.

    Doing it the old-fashioned way means finding one of like five people in the world who also know the answer, and hope they’ll respond (they may very much not), or spend months studying obscure prerequisite materials, likely to still end up with a dead end. With the deadline pressure and KPIs, this often means abandoning an immediate direction of work altogether, not a cozy library session.

    LLMs, on the other hand, are unrivaled at contextual search and can obtain essential data from obscure sources in a matter of seconds. They are also great at explaining the jargon, allowing researchers and students in narrow fields to focus on what matters instead of getting another major on the side simply to understand the wording around an otherwise trivial concept.

    All that, so brains would be busy with something other than guessing. You know, the actual problems to solve.








  • I’m currently pursuing a PhD and working on a level where it’s hard to find an expert, and volumes of new information that don’t allow me to do so for any single minor inquiry.

    This is the step at which the “teacher”, be it scientific supervisor or a prof on the subject, might very much not know the answer. LLMs, however, have access to a large corpus of data that allows to untangle this mess in a quick and efficient way.

    Any understanding I get from the LLM’s explanation I verify against the academic books I follow and practical runs. Only when I’m certain I grasped it right, I put it into my work. And LLM was indeed very wrong on one occasion, and slightly inconsistent on some more.