• 0 Posts
  • 16 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 10th, 2025

help-circle
  • It is better because it uses 2 times water as reference point.

    Not one thing and then a completely different one.

    We could for example set the 0 degrees at the freezing point of alcohol and 100 at the boiling point.

    Or 0 at the boiling point of argon and 100 at the temperature it turns into plasma.

    Both of these fictional scales are better than Fahrenheit.


  • Yes both are made up. As everything we use to count or measure is.

    However it depends how they were made up.

    Fahrenheit was set to 0 on the lowest temperature someone could achieve at time. And 100 was set to the body temperature of the human body. Totally two comparable points of measurement.

    Celsius uses the melting point of water as 0.and then uses, revolutionary, the same water when it changes its state from liquid to gas.










  • Additionally, why it is stupid to build new nuclear plants (keep the old ones as long as the maintenance is not too high).

    If you now decide you need 1 GW in 10 years Then you can plan your nuclear power plant and start to build it. However as we know it will now take 30 years to build it and costs 10 times as much, while your demand is now 4 GW.

    Also what do you do in the meantime? Hope that the power is enough for 10 years?

    Nuclear is expensive, not scalable, and takes way too long to build.

    It is pretty safe. Especially new reactors. Also the atomic waste should be recycled in different nuclear reactors, which can use it as fuel, but those are still in research.


  • Yeah Germany fucked it really hard.

    Going away from nuclear without a good plan b to replace the power was stupid.

    We basically replaced nuclear power with wind and solar, but the new power demand that was coming since the turning off of the nuclear plants, was achieved by building gas turbines. So fossil fuels again.

    And now our energy minister is a lobbyist from the gas energy sector…


  • Johanno@lemmy.dbzer0.comtomemes@lemmy.worldJust saying
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    France is heavily subsiding nuclear power.

    Without it, it would be the most expensive one.

    I am all in for nuclear power, as long as it is waaaaay cheaper than it is right now.

    Even buying the uranium is today more expensive than building a solar plant. (compared to resources per power generation)


  • Johanno@lemmy.dbzer0.comtomemes@lemmy.worldJust saying
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah because companies in the US exploit everything and everyone until they get stopped (which they don’t)

    And probably because fossil energy gets subsidised heavily to compete with renewable energy. So on your electricity bill the fossil is cheaper but your taxes are sent there ten times.

    Well currently the US is fucked anyway