

Not quite in orbit yet, but in space! The burn to enter orbit is in approximately 20 minutes.
If they were to continue flying witout this next burn, they would re-enter the atmosphere in around an hour and a half.


Not quite in orbit yet, but in space! The burn to enter orbit is in approximately 20 minutes.
If they were to continue flying witout this next burn, they would re-enter the atmosphere in around an hour and a half.


If only there were charges that could be brought against people who do something like that…


Creating a pin with the number pad then having to remember it with a normal keyboard… 🫠


I didn’t think you actually need /s for that statement… That’s almost exactly what happened
At least you don’t have negative wealth and in turn have 10x less wealth


I have to suspect it’s 200b yen, even though the article states “$200 billion”. The later with a 15% tarrif would imply $1.33 trillion in US sales in the last year, which I highly doubt


Well, you are likely on a list now 🫠


Like Luigi shooting fish in a barrel


Omnibus bills. Oh you want this one thing? Well we can only do that if we do these other 20 unrelated things at the same time.


Like the vote that failed yesterday, where Republicans just bent over and let him do what he wants?


Get off your high horse and accept that people do things different than you.


It’ll probably go up because now all the billionaires know they are aligned in vision
Not sure I follow. Someone care to fill me in?
With the bike, the battery (and pedaling) is the source of your net energy output. Losses from friction to the ground and air drag will be the most significant net consumers of the energy. It doesn’t matter how the rest of that energy is moved around within the system(s) of the bike.
Ultimately, what determines the distance you travel is the capacity of the battery and what external environmental factors affect the bike and by how much. Biking at 3m/s will have less air drag than 10m/s. Friction will be affected by the surfaces you go over, with something like mud taking more energy compared to something smooth like smooth concrete.
On an e-bike you would be losing significant portion of energy from propelling the bike, friction, air drag and heat loss. You might be able to put a small amount of energy back in from pedaling, going down hills or even braking, but certainly not enough to make it perpetual.
Perpetual motion machine are physically impossible based on our current understanding of physics. Many, many people have attempted to create them, but they all fail from the reaaons above.
Wednesnanosecond, Wednespicosecond, Wednesfemtosecond, …
deleted by creator


Apparently big change comes with the number 47…
I made the comment that I could just show ksp and use it for better visuals of telemetry and representations of what maneuvers they were making