Maybe if we stopped letting bad things happen, there wouldn’t be so much bad news.

You were right. Red Hat leads all time.

All the major organizational contributors are guilty of profiting from genocide. TempleOS might be the one true alternative.

I see. Ty

Why do you make the argument that Red Hat is the biggest contributor?

Searching Linux contributor breakdown by organization puts them tied for 3rd at ~7%.

https://insights.linuxfoundation.org/project/korg/contributors?timeRange=past365days&start=2025-06-19&end=2026-06-19

https://commandlinux.com/statistics/linux-kernel-contributors-lines-of-code-statistics/

Don’t get me wrong. Intel leading the corporate contributions is worse. lol

All-time contributions are led by Red Hat at 15%. Many top organizational contributors guilty of profiting from the genocidal industrial complex. Maybe TempleOS was the true alternative.

https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/7022/“Another-genocide-behind-walls”:-New-report-documents-testimonies-of-rape-and-sexual-violence-in-Israeli-prisons

Dogs used as tools of rape are mentioned multiple times in the report.

They seem to still believe in the discredited Biden era philosophy that if you simply do good things people will notice.

Good things like supporting genocidal ethnostates or signing bills to make worker strikes illegal?

Just to be clear, I’m not a professional ‘quote maker’. I’m just an atheist teenager who greatly values his intelligence and scientific fact over any silly fiction book written 3,500 years ago. This being said, I am open to any and all criticism.

“In this moment, I am euphoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my intelligence.” - Aalewis

Eh?

LMAO

IIRC he married an Israeli and moved to a house in the occupied territories.

Are there any longstanding open source alternatives to Android OS?

https://jewishcurrents.org/are-95-of-jews-really-zionists

No matter which way you look at it, 80-90% of Americans that identify as Jewish are generally Zionist in some shape, way, or form.

Substantial majorities of American Jews respond positively to these types of questions. Pew’s 2013 survey found that 69% of American Jews were somewhat (39%) or very (30%) emotionally attached to Israel, while 31% were not very (22%) or not at all (9%) attached. Eighty-seven percent of American Jews said that caring about Israel is either essential (43%) or at least important (44%) to what being Jewish means to them. (Elements that scored higher were remembering the Holocaust, at 97%, and leading an ethical and moral life, at 94%. Statistically tied with Israel were working for justice and equality in society, at 89%, and being intellectually curious, at 85%). In a similar question on AJC’s 2020 survey, 59% of American Jews reported that being connected to Israel was a very (29%) or somewhat (30%) important part of their Jewish identity.

RECENTLY, some polls of American Jews have bucked the trend of focusing only on “emotional attachment” and have directly asked more politically laden questions about “pro-Israel” identification, starting with a survey commissioned by the Jewish Electorate Institute (JEI, an affiliate of the Jewish Democratic Council of America) in the fall of 2018. Conducted by the Mellman Group, a polling firm run by Mark Mellman (now also the CEO of the Democratic Majority for Israel PAC), the poll of 800 American Jewish voters asked respondents which of the following best described them: “Generally pro-Israel and supportive of the current Israeli government’s policies” (32%); “Generally pro-Israel but also critical of some of the current Israeli government’s policies” (35%); Generally pro-Israel but also critical of many of the current Israeli government’s policies” (24%); or “Generally not pro-Israel” (3%).

In total, 92% of respondents chose one of the “generally pro-Israel” options. There was also a fifth option for a respondent having “no opinion,” which was not represented on the graph in the JEI’s report of the poll, but presumably numbers approximately 5%. The fact that the graph does not sum to 100% has led to mistakes when reporting on the poll, such as in a recent interview of Jewish Currents Editor-in-Chief Arielle Angel by JTA Opinion Editor Laura E. Adkins, in which Adkins claims that this poll reported that “97% of American Jews are pro-Israel.” Presumably Adkins arrived at that figure by subtracting the 3% “not pro-Israel” from 100%. (Mellman told Jewish Currents that the “no opinion” option was not presented in the results for the sake of “simplicity.”) Three later surveys commissioned by JEI, conducted by different polling firms, showed similar results, with 88% (2019), 91% (February 2020), and 88% (September 2020) of respondents choosing one of the “generally pro-Israel” options.

In December 2019, a Ruderman Family Foundation poll, also conducted by the Mellman Group, asked this same question to a larger sample of American Jews. Ruderman called it “the most comprehensive survey of the Jewish community in the United States in recent years, and one of the largest ever.” (The sample size was 2,500 and the margin of error was 1.96%, compared to a 3,475 sample size and 3.0% margin of error in the highly regarded Pew poll.) Unlike the JEI poll, this poll sampled all American Jews, rather than Jewish voters specifically, and the results showed a significant difference in the percentage of respondents who chose a pro-Israel option. In the Ruderman poll, about 80% of the general sample of American Jews chose pro-Israel options as opposed to the average of about 90% over the three JEI surveys of American Jewish voters.

The pro-Israel answers in the Ruderman poll included a relatively even split of those who were supportive (23%), critical of some (28%), and critical of many (29%) Israeli policies. Six percent were “generally not pro-Israel,” and 14% did not have a view. Mellman said that the differences in the sample of American Jewish voters versus American Jews more broadly likely accounts for this gap between the JEI results and Ruderman results: “As with all voters, Jewish voters skew a little bit older, a little bit better educated, and obviously, more politically interested than the average Jew.”

Do you condemn Israel for its atrocities that span from 1948 to the present day?

Do you condemn the founders of Israel that have committed atrocities from well before 1948?

Do you condemn Zionists that have been perpetuating, justifying, or supporting Israel’s atrocities against humanity for the past 70+ years?

Do you condemn Zionism?

Do you condemn Israel?

You’re probably right. I don’t think they meant any ill. If anything, I made my words a bit harsh because I was fed a similar myth growing up. Sometimes you need a new direct and visceral perspective to see something in a new light. We need to be as ruthless towards Zionism on an ideological basis as we are towards Nazism.

What meaningful divergence is there? Since the 19th century, Zionists such as Herzl were discussing means to ethnically cleanse the local populace via economic domination.

In practice, Zionists starting coming in droves armed, aiding the British in committing atrocities and suppressing Palestinian dissent and resistance. Then during the Nakba, they would straight up rape, murder, and rob the Palestinians.

Is the divergence in Zionism similar to that of Nazism, where the initial good peacenik Nazis simply wanted to peacefully relocate Europe’s Jewish population to madagascar? Are we going to act like the very pursuit of an ethnostate is not problematic in and of itself?

People seem to forget that when it came to Nazi rhetoric, the Nazis initially claimed they just wanted to “move the Jews”.

There’s a reason why the concentration extermination camps were called “The Final Solution” and not “First Attempt at creating an Aryan haven!”

For anyone curious, here’s a website where you get to guess whether a quote is from a Nazi or Zionist: https://zionism.wtf/#zionist-or-nazi

I’m always happy to help educate a fellow goy!

What is Zionism?

In short, Zionism is just Nazism but replace Aryan with Jew.

The more fleshed out answer is that Zionism is an ideology with its basis being Jewish racial supremacy. Just like with Nazi ideology and the Aryans, Zionist ideology believes in both the right and the entitlement to an ethnostate of a “special” or “chosen” people no matter the means, even if it comes at the deprivation of rights and injustice of other people.

Why is this problematic?

The problem is two-fold and can be found by observing history. During the founding of the current iteration of the Zionist project, known as Israel, the Jewish racial supremacists would rape, murder, and rob the indigenous people initially living on the land where the supremacists wanted to establish their ethnostate. Currently, Zionists will glorify, support, and perpetuate these actions to keep the ethnostate alive.

Why do Zionists glorify, support, or partake in rape, murder, and thievery?

First, Zionists believe racial Jews have the literal right commit such heinous actions against others, as Zionism holds racial Jews to be superior to others or as “God’s chosen people”. Second, even if these actions are deemed evil, Zionism justifies them as “necessary” evils, as they ensure the establishment and perpetuation of the Jewish ethnostate–something Zionism holds above all else.

Summary

A person who is a Zionist is a person who believes that racial Jews have the right to rape, murder, and rob others, whether due to their perceived privilege or to ensure the establishment and perpetuation of their ethnostate.

I hope this answers your question!

The comments from the enlightened athiests are killing me, lmao.

OP, from my understanding of Jewish religion, whether your dogma permisses the consumption of biscuits or not can be found by observing your stance on Zionism.

If you’re Zionist, you’re already rebelling against Yahweh’s decree of Three Oath’s by either outright denial or by thinking you can outsmart Yahweh through some perceived technicality or loophole. If that’s the case, by all means, eat all the biscuits you desire; you’ll eventually find someway to convince yourself that you didn’t actually violate the decrees during Passover anyways.

Now, if you’re not a Zionist, then you are actually following Yahweh and give proper respect and credence into the very spirit of Yahweh’s decrees. In that case, no, do not eat any biscuits. Just like Lent and Ramadan, Passover will eventually. . . pass over, and you will live to eat your beloved biscuits another day.

You know, all this targeting of children and infants reminds me of the Pharoah’s slaughter of the Jewish infants in ancient Egypt. . . What was the reason again?

When I responded to the commenter before you, I was thinking more in the general sense with scientific constructivism and the Bohrian interpretation of observation, measurement, and reality in mind.

However, what you said reminds me of the more institutionalized issues plaguing the sciences, and my mind went to the textbook case of The Bell Curve.

Science is a construct made by humans in their effort to best understand the world they exist in. The consciousness of science is not nothing, but the collective conciousness of every human being that has participated, and along with it, their collective follies and limitations.