They’re incredibly arbitrary. Each of them can just be collapsed into “acts of service” an act of service can be a gift, quality time is something that happens alongside the others (and is also something that can be described as a gift) and physical touch is (or should be) quality time.

It was made up by an american pastor to gaslight women, it doesn’t have any basis beyond what he felt like. He made up arbitrary categories that would help him sell his spiel about women listening to men.

Ive made a new category; Being nice. It takes all the other categories. The love languages are now: Being nice.

would of literally their

Sure thing boss

Whatever you say pal

Rough to just start them off with Kapital, dont you think?

The book written by an aristocratic rapist snitch about how common people are just too stupid to take care of themselves?

calling you a paper tiger

Yeah, that’s called projecting, bud

I’d honestly probably start with Lenin. Or at least not the Manifesto if you want anything more than, well, a Manifesto. If you wanna start with Marx/Engels then I would say Engels “On Authority” might be a good place to start. Or perhaps “The 18th brumaire of Louis Napoleon” by Marx.

Meat industry lobbied for it.

Meat industry lobbied for it.

Such a good book. You might not have made it that far, but its more or less stated that what really happened was

• The virus comes out
• Meat industry and meat lobby still exists
• Lobbies to make human meat legal to eat
• Spreads a bunch of stories about people eating each other due to lack of meat
• Corrupt politicians give in to the lobby

But its not really important. Its background noise to the story. The story is about the dude and about the society and about how we view women and animals and each other. Its a book that could not have been written by a man.

Fair point.

To have a conversation? To get further insight into how a person thinks? To gain understanding? To talk about the ideological framework through which the person views the world, and hopefully gain some perspective out of that talk?

Noo Wikipedia definitely does not have any systemic issues. Its not like its full of Nazis or zionist or power users. Oh wait all three of those are common “human interest” stories about the site.

The irony of not understanding that objectivity is not possible when describing events, while being subjective in your critique yourself.
Prolewiki is precisely as biased as Wikipedia, it just admits it, which is preferable since it is easier to be aware of your bias if you actually take it into account.

Which it was. Do you not look into things before talking about them? You also say it “asserts” it, as if it doesn’t source the claims made.
You seem to be conflating “not reinforcing my worldview” with “being wrong and unfounded”

The drawback to a pack of dogs is the food consumption. In a nuclear apocalypse rationing is going to be difficult already, maintaining stores of kibble or other dogfeed for a whole pack would be a real burden.
If its not nuclear then I guess there’s enough protein to go around.

Id probably try to keep some horses too, if food and drink isn’t a worry. Maybe goats too, but now we’re going into animal husbandry

Why?