Bro, left dominates higher education. The idea that there’s some conservative cabal brainwashing law students is hilarious.

And the left didn’t do the exact same thing for their judges? Y’all are all just incorruptible while the right are spawn of Satan or something?..

ridiculous

Matter of perspective.

Judges are appointed for life; there’s really no reason why they would match lock step with Trumps orders. Yes they’re conservative (not all of them), but I don’t believe they’re going to break the law or compromise their integrity for Trump.

Qualified immunity can be stripped. It’s not absolute. Constitutional violations are absolutely grounds for losing qualified immunity.

Oh well go, go win the midterms.

You can sue the individual.

Sounds like an excellent opportunity to sue them into the ground. A federal officer illegal disregarding your constitutional rights is a payday most can only dream of.

So chill out and lawyer up.

Joe Biden deported 35% of detainees for no reason? What an absolute piece of garbage.

They use the immigration law as a thinly veiled attempt at a disguise, that’s about it.

If true; it sounds like a class action law suit will be an excellent way of punishing the administration and compensating those effected. And that doesn’t even require people dying in the streets.

I only see one side doing that - ICE.
The “other side” is civilians being very restrained, making rest of the world ask Wtf murica?

Obstructing a federal officer is not de-escalation. If protestors want to park outside a federal building, or go to DC and protest that’s fine. Verbally aggressive flash mobs that stalk ICE vehicles is not a constitutionally protected form of protest.

ICEis not enforcing any legitimate federal law.

I don’t understand this at all. They’re enforcing federal immigration law; and in the situations where theyre interacting with citizens like Good; it’s due to the citizens violating federal law by obstructing their actions; and they absolutely have the authority to detain and arrest people who obstruct their duties.

If you supported people protesting on Jan. 6th before they stormed the barriers, why do you think people protesting in Minnesota are in the wrong?

Oh I support Minnesota’s right to protest; however your right to protest does not extend to obstructing official duties of a law enforcement officer. If your protest strategy is flash mobs that intimidate and make the job of working officers more difficult then that protest is not a protected right under the first amendment.

Also, how do you feel about the use of thermal cameras to scan and preemptively target individuals carrying concealed weapons?

Smart, but also easily bypassed by anyone whose determined to do so; so maybe it’s kind of useless.

Do you think 10 gunshots, all fired after a suspect has already been disarmed and is no longer a threat, is a bit excessive? Not enough gunshots? Or the goldilocks level of just right

Most experts would say that it’s too soon to make judgements about the shooting. There’s more information coming out every minute. I would love to see an independent investigation, but we all know that won’t happen. But yes it seems really botched, really messed up; but back to what I said earlier, there are many many people to blame here. If the shooting was unjustified then absolutely the shooter will carry most of the blame, but everyone is at fault here.

Quick question, who was in the wrong on January 6th, 2021?

Wow, what is this? You checking my papers to see if you’re allowed to continue the conversation?

Who was wrong, Trump, DC police, capital police, the protestors that went passed the barriers, certainly every protestor that agressed towards police; and following that, the Biden administration for the way they handled 95% of the prosecution against said protestors.

if ISIS came into your town and started killing your neighbors, would you be encouraging everybody to just lay low?

I don’t think the analogy works. ISIS isn’t a legitimate federal law enforcement agency enforcing federal law. If my neighbor went to Iran and got shot by ISIS while protesting, I would think he’s an absolute idiot; but at the same time I would wish it hadn’t happened. If my neighbor illegally entered Iran or overstayed a visa and was rounded up by ISIS and then imprisoned before being deported; I would also think, wow what an absolite idiot, I wish he hadn’t done that; but that’s a very normal occurance for immigration crime worldwide.

To be clear, I’m not saying he was in the wrong in any way for being armed.

I haven’t really heard much about this situation. I’ve seen some videos and it seems incredibly sketch at the very least. It doesn’t appear that he did anything wrong and he was within his rights to be there and was carrying lawfully.

However that being said… You’re perfectly within your rights to confront an angry bull that’s rampaging through your living room; but when you get gored people will ask why you put yourself in that situation.

There are no innocents in this situation. Both sides are making bad choice and escalating at every chance they get. Trump could have pulled ICE out and levied sanctions on Minnesota. Waltz could have told everyone to go home, that the fight is not on the streets. ICE could have chose to not shoot. Good could have not obstructed. No one here is making good choices because backing down in the heat of the moment is construed as weakness.

Everyone needs cooling down, if mother was in charge everyone would be getting a spanking.

Troll = Doesn’t agree with your policial takes; brilliant.

So all the people supporting this guy are changing their tune on Kyle Rittenhouse showing up armed to defend his community, right?

Right?

Oh yeah; I’m feeling all the cognitive disidence downvotes flowing in.

Viagra will kill the shit out of you if you have a heart attack and the emergency room gives you nitroglycerin.

Well. Maybe you don’t die, but it won’t have the intended effect.

Oh, you called me a name. Im so changing my mind now…

Farcry 3 remastered incoming

The obvious flaw is that humans are dynamic and evolving and you may not always be in the majority. Therefore you should be fair to everyone.

John Rawls’s “veil of ignorance” comes to mind.

The idea of the thought experiment is the creation of a society with the designer behind a veil of ignorance, that is, after the society is created they do not know the circumstances that they will have when joining the society.