Mog Spawn@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 days agoDecomposed body in handcuffs, Nazi paraphernalia found in Stamford, Conn. gunman's home, police saywww.cbsnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square41linkfedilinkarrow-up1168arrow-down12
arrow-up1166arrow-down1external-linkDecomposed body in handcuffs, Nazi paraphernalia found in Stamford, Conn. gunman's home, police saywww.cbsnews.comMog Spawn@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 days agomessage-square41linkfedilink
minus-squaremfed1122@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·12 days agoMaybe I’m wrong, but shouldn’t this grammatically be “Kapitulieren nicht”?
minus-squareKirp123@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up30·12 days agoHe was just a regular nazi not a grammar nazi.
minus-squareDiplomjodler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·12 days agoNo. The closest I can come up with would be “Niemals kapitulieren”.
minus-squareanton@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·12 days agoNot quite, “Kapituliere nicht” would be the correct imperative form, but sounds a bit weak. “Kapitulieren? Nein!” would work, but not without the question mark. No surrender would be “keine Kapitulation”.
Maybe I’m wrong, but shouldn’t this grammatically be “Kapitulieren nicht”?
He was just a regular nazi not a grammar nazi.
chef’s kiss
No. The closest I can come up with would be “Niemals kapitulieren”.
Not quite, “Kapituliere nicht” would be the correct imperative form, but sounds a bit weak. “Kapitulieren? Nein!” would work, but not without the question mark. No surrender would be “keine Kapitulation”.