lemmyland
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year ago

John Conway proves that 91 is the smallest number which looks prime but isn't

www.youtube.com

external-link
message-square
19
link
fedilink
110
external-link

John Conway proves that 91 is the smallest number which looks prime but isn't

www.youtube.com

threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
19
link
fedilink
- YouTube
www.youtube.com
external-link
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some superstitious nerdy teenagers convinced small child me that 91 was a universal anomaly bc it’s 13 (bad luck) * 7 (good luck), so my weird brain never saw 91 as prime , & I can’t be the only person this happened to

  • mvirts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No it’s 51

    • TunaCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Naw, 5 + 1 = 6, 6 is divisible by 3, so 51 is divisible by 3.

      • OpenStars@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        1 year ago

        img

      • xpinchx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I shared this at work recently and nobody cared. 3 6 and 9 are all kinda special.

    • I'll be on ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only if you weren’t taught (or were, but too long ago lol) the divisible by 3 rule - if the sum of the digits is divisible by 3, so is the whole number. 5+1=6 therefore 51 is divisible by 3! Bonus division rule - if it was also an even number and therefore divisible by 2, you could deduce that the whole number was divisible by 6.

      • Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Actually 51/3! Is 8.5

        • Cadeillac@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          You bastard

        • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          !unexpectedfactorial@sopuli.xyz

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Actually, 51 is not divisible by 3!

        It is divisible by 3

        • I'll be on ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hilarious.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Surely it’s 1? Looks prime, and some people will even argue that it is!

      • mvirts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Its only factors are 1 and itself after all

    • demonmittenhands@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. 51 looks prime AF.

  • erie09@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I always felt that 21 should be, but nooo. Stupid 7

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      21 should be

      2 + 1 = 3, therefore 21 is divisible by 3 and is not prime. QED :)

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        9+1 = 10, therefore 91 is divisible by 10 and is not a prime … QED, I guess

        • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          In the right base, that might work.

  • lunarul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s funny, but actually a good proof

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zone

mathmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !mathmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Memes related to mathematics.

Rules:
1: Memes must be related to mathematics in some way.
2: No bigotry of any kind.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 87 users / week
  • 221 users / month
  • 2.1K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 3.11K subscribers
  • 138 Posts
  • 1.58K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • NotAUser@lemmy.blahaj.zone
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org