renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square131linkfedilinkarrow-up11.27Karrow-down126
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imageAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square131linkfedilink
minus-squareAeonFelis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 years agoXML is good for markup. The problem is that people too often confuse “markup” and “serialization”.
minus-squarebss03@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoToo redundant, just use S-exprs. (Mostly joking, but in some cases…)
minus-squareSystemNeo@toast.ooodeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoUnironically. Given the choice between S-expressions and XML, I will choose S-expressions.
XML is good for markup. The problem is that people too often confuse “markup” and “serialization”.
Too redundant, just use S-exprs.
(Mostly joking, but in some cases…)
Unironically.
Given the choice between S-expressions and XML, I will choose S-expressions.