You must log in or # to comment.
deleted by creator
I used to have trust in the peer review process, thinking this is why it takes months or years for a paper to get published. Are you telling me it’s not real?
deleted by creator
find and report scientific errors
Hell, the fact that any articles have been published with the openAI “I can’t provide up-to-date info” means that shit’s not getting read properly, overall.
Though errors are somewhat monitored by Retraction Watch.
Sounds like you already worked it out.
Depends on what journal is reviewing the paper.
The value of a scientists, how funny this world is
deleted by creator
It’s from the movie Monster House
In so many more ways than one… :-(
Why Don’t make your own journal with free distribution?
Its bigger than me, or you. This tracks the Open Access movement in academia: http://tagteam.harvard.edu/remix/oatp/items
Some people did, look up the Peer Community Journal. Backed up by more and more organisations.
deleted by creator
Kinda sad that this is necessary or seen as necessary
“How much are they?” is a question.
“How much they are” is a statement.
And “How much they are?” is a question. See? Question mark right there.
Why think that work you how?
Descriptivistic nanomachines, son!
Descriptivism doesn’t mean people can’t fuck up.
Incorrect.
