So what’s wrong with just releasing a monolithic static binary for each architecture you want to run it on?

I read the post, and it sounds like what the author did in the end. I just don’t get why it was the last thing he tried. I don’t get why Linux software packaging has to be so complex.

Because you need a fuckton of energy to produce an EMP capable of damaging anything. Unless you have access to military grade warheads or a low yield nuclear device, you can forget about it.

I don’t know of any diesel electric cars, but most diesel locomotives use their diesel engines to generate electricity to run the drivetrain.

NO2? Man, I hope you guys weren’t huffing Nitrogen Dioxide!

Wow! I’m really tempted to try this myself. I’ve had bad floaters for as long as I can remember.

I am curious about side effects, though. If these enzymes degrade collagen, that means they could induce or exacerbate arthritis, right?

So Windows 11?

Physiological thriller? Like an anatomy book?

They annoy me because Microsoft keeps cramming their updates full of invasive spyware/adware and “ai” features that I don’t want and have to jump through hoops to disable

As an engineer, this hits close to home.

Doctor Zaius!?