The sun toaster thing from technological connections is lit

Except good working boots are not cheaper just more comfortable. Due to the sole being a raised you need to replace it every 2-3 years which isn’t that cheap either. Speaking from experience

Tbh this is more effort than most ppl put into their posts

Running more multi box copies of gw2

This is a gay sex joke isn’t it?

May I introduce you to the concept of time travel in the time machine, where you are in a gravitationally bound dimensional pocket

I can assure you most flurries are not trans. Trekkies on the other hand

Funny

Ok but where is that other possibility you are talking about? There are like you said and stated 4 different ways:

Both agree and agree on the splitting of possessions

Both agree and disagree on the splitting of possessions

Your spouse commits “serious or renewed violation of the duties and obligations”

And you don’t live together anymore for at least a year and this is not consensually (which it seems you would also have to prove)

Given you live in a dead bedroom relationship (say after you got children or due to medical problems) and you accepted it (which can take years already). From these 4 choices you are basically out of luck and stuck. Either you get a new place (and potentially abandon your children) or you can proof that you life together but in rapture(I think that’s the correct word) but this can very easily be impeded by your spouse and if you are the primary caregiver for your children even hard to proof. I mean you can get your own bank but when your partner just doesn’t give you money you kinda still have to use the shared one or get bills paid by your partner. Do I miss anything here? Because this means instead of however long a divorce will take it will now take at least a year more. Because if I see this correctly with the acceptance period and cout time this will already take upwards of 4 years or 5% of your life were your needs will not be satisfied(or even attempted to be satisfied).

I don’t know about France but most civilized countries I know about have laws against rape in marriage, without looking it up I guess France have too. Martial obligations should encompass normal relationship things like caring for each other, being consensual and having sex. Saying key points for a median relationship like sex are not part of your obligation in a marriage feels absurd to me. Feeling coerced to have sex to not fault the marriage for me feels again completely illogical even as an argument. At this point your marriage is broken because at least one partner is very unhappy with it. This will just prolong the time you are stuck in a broken marriage and therefor maximize unhappiness. Having a dead bedroom marriage can even lead to you being unfaithful, faulting your marriage. Sex is the strongest urge in humans after all. This all just seems like a lot of Christian morals and not much of useful laws.

Btw if sex is not a martial obligation why is faithfulness again? Does sex now matter for marriage or does it not?

For me this feels just like populism. instead of useful and meaningful changes to an obviously broken law a bandaid is used that just makes the law more broken. It is based on “things have occured” without any data to back it up just on a “feels like it level”. Why, instead, scrap option 3 and 4 and just replace it with a “doesn’t work for me anymore” option? Why is there still a judgement based system and not a relationship quality based system in place? Because this is just veiled populism, sexism and religious moral.

Can you pls not misgender me thank you

I mean I am not from France but as far as I can see there is not an option in this list from that is not a fault and not strictly a way to do a divorce on your own. https://refugies.info/en/procedure/60a7b164331be50014dd88cc

How does this work then can you guide me to information about it?

The only option here would be to not live together which maybe impossible for you financially or could even be boycotted by your partner and it would take a year at least as far as I can see here. So therefore their needs to be a different way you didn’t had on your list or on the refugirs info side that’s an option for a faultless one sided divorce because you are in a sexless marriage

Except that is exactly what this law states - that you can onesidedly divorce based on a sexless marriage. So now you cant divorce for fault and need your spouses approval

I mean I think it is a game … Maybe? Something on mobile?

I mean I don’t know where you are from but at least where I live they have to identify if asked to and they can’t just detain you without cause. While cause can be pretty broad, like there was a crime in the neighborhood, it can’t be “we don’t like your face”.

Who the fuck is that.

Lots of mods for older games circumvent steam, so steam does not know about the game running. Famous example was Skyrim and Skyrim script extender. If this is the case with mmod idk

Having a gas stove myself I can tell you there are only 2 temperatures to hot and way to hot. There is no low and medium so what you will end up doing is cycling the heat in and off yourself all the time.

Further there are many different electric stoves. From the old just an electric heater over infrared based to induction based. Due to having a lot of different homes in my life I have cooked with everything and all electric stoves are way easier and maintain heat way better than a gas stove and you can have low and medium heat.

Well theoretically no there is a condition called Polymelia where you can have more than 4 limbs. in reality it will be <2 and >1.8

Well but what about all the other researchers that didn’t recreate this study?

Basically a big problem in especially medical science is that studies are not redone and retested like in a lot of other stem fields. It’s not only some bad actors it’s a kind of broken system.

I think you should never reshelf books yourself.

For one you can’t be absolutely sure which archiving system is used in the specific library without either asking or working there, which kind of moots the point.

For another this can put back wrongly archived books back in the system. While it seems reasonable that a book is archieved correctly this does not have to be the case and therefore simply putting it back could be wrong